16
Other Game Systems / Re: RM Revision
« on: February 27, 2022, 07:33:18 AM »
To be clear: I only provided the above example as a demonstration of how ICE could have revised in a manner that updated the rules a bit while not playing right into the hands of the 30+ years of bias from gamers that endlessly refer to RM as chartmaster etc.
Agreed - no system is perfect. RM & HARP have their strengths, just like D&D does, and Novus. I quite enjoyed RMSS actually as I found it at a time in life where I really wanted to go all in with characters and stories so the skill category system was appealing...at the time. I think a fully developed HARP/MERP hybrid (which I have poked at for my own purposes) would have been close to the ideal system (IMO) as it would been immediately more digestible than RMSS/RMFRP & ultimately RMU.
The problem with ICE is that they are, seemingly, not savvy to the fact that you have to actually have a product to sell. It's clearly being run by hobbyists, not people trying to make a living off of it, so there is this air of acceptability to the projects just dragging on forever.
Agreed - no system is perfect. RM & HARP have their strengths, just like D&D does, and Novus. I quite enjoyed RMSS actually as I found it at a time in life where I really wanted to go all in with characters and stories so the skill category system was appealing...at the time. I think a fully developed HARP/MERP hybrid (which I have poked at for my own purposes) would have been close to the ideal system (IMO) as it would been immediately more digestible than RMSS/RMFRP & ultimately RMU.
The problem with ICE is that they are, seemingly, not savvy to the fact that you have to actually have a product to sell. It's clearly being run by hobbyists, not people trying to make a living off of it, so there is this air of acceptability to the projects just dragging on forever.